Level 3 scholar of interpretation and Quranic sciences
Abstract
The knowledge of God and above all the proof of the existence of a supreme being is the most important principle of human beliefs because it is the basis of other beliefs and shapes his outlook on life and consequently his actions, behavior and character. For this reason, in this article, we have tried to prove the existence of God with the special precision and scrutiny that Ibn Sina and Allameh Hali had, in this way that we first present the principle of the proof and show its strength in proving the Supreme Being, then the points of commonality. And after obtaining the difference, we present the difference between the theology of Sheikh al-Raees and Allameh through careful analysis and analysis. Our main goal in explaining the proofs from the language of these two pillars of the Islamic world is to analyze the belief in God and how it is explained in different educational and research positions. In this article, descriptive analytical method is used. It can be said that the strength of Ibn Sina's arguments in proving Wajib Ta'ala is rare, but Allameh considers the narration as a witness and a clear proof of his existence, so he settles for a philosophical argument. Their participation in this argument is the middle ground, that is, the material possibility.
------------- کشف المراد فی شرح تجرید الاعتقاد، تصحیح استاد حسن زاده آملی، موسسه نشر اسلامی، چاپ ششم، 1416 ه. ق.
------------- الابحاث المفیده فی تحصیل العقیده، نسخه‌ی خطی کتابخانه ملی به شماره‌ی 1926، به خط محمد جواد بن کلبعلی، در سال 1090 نوشته شده است. (فهرست کتابخانه ملی، ج 10، ص 630)
------------- انوار الملکوت فی شرح الیاقوت، تصحیح و تحشیه و مقدمه محمد نجمی زنجانی، تهران، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، 1338 ه. ق.
سبزواری، ملأ هادی، شرح المنظومه، قم، مؤسسه دارالعلم، 1366، ج 2.
------------- الاعتماد فی شرح واجب الاعتقاد، تحقیق صفاءالدین بصری، مجمع البحوث الاسلامیه، ایران، مشهد، چاپ اول، 1412 ه. ق.
صدر المتألهین، صدرالدین محمد بن ابراهیم الشیرازی، الحکمه المتعالیه فی الاسفار العقلیه الاربعه، جلد 2.
Falahati, R. (2021). Comparative analysis of the proof of the existence of God
From the point of view of Avicenna and Allama Hali. The quarterly journal of the modern jurisprudence of women and family, 2(3), 25-46.
MLA
Razia Falahati. "Comparative analysis of the proof of the existence of God
From the point of view of Avicenna and Allama Hali". The quarterly journal of the modern jurisprudence of women and family, 2, 3, 2021, 25-46.
HARVARD
Falahati, R. (2021). 'Comparative analysis of the proof of the existence of God
From the point of view of Avicenna and Allama Hali', The quarterly journal of the modern jurisprudence of women and family, 2(3), pp. 25-46.
VANCOUVER
Falahati, R. Comparative analysis of the proof of the existence of God
From the point of view of Avicenna and Allama Hali. The quarterly journal of the modern jurisprudence of women and family, 2021; 2(3): 25-46.
)